Skip to content

JobNimbus Feedback

Have suggestions for how we can improve? Share them in the categories, or vote for the ideas you like best. We want to hear your feedback!

Please only include one suggestion per post. While we can't respond to every suggestion, we are committed to reviewing every suggestion individually.

Robbie Thomae

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 78 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robbie Thomae commented  · 

    100% Agree. The sync is already established between QB and JN so why not map a new set of fields in the financial tab of each contact/job called "Job Costs" or "COGS" that sync directly into JN. This has several advantages.
    1. From a sales representative perspective, it allows for full transparency of their actual job margins and commission payouts.
    2. From a production manager perspective, (this assumes that most production managers do not have access to their companies QB account since that is typically reserved for owners and bookkeepers) it allows for a more complete analysis of the job and ability to more efficiently discover and address inconsistencies.
    3. From an economy of motion perspective, it simply reduces the amount of work required to make a meaningful comparison between budget vs. actual because these job costs would no longer have to be manually entered.

    Robbie Thomae supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base