Robbie Thomae
My feedback
1 result found
-
78 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Robbie Thomae supported this idea ·
Have suggestions for how we can improve? Share them in the categories, or vote for the ideas you like best. We want to hear your feedback!
Please only include one suggestion per post. While we can't respond to every suggestion, we are committed to reviewing every suggestion individually.
1 result found
100% Agree. The sync is already established between QB and JN so why not map a new set of fields in the financial tab of each contact/job called "Job Costs" or "COGS" that sync directly into JN. This has several advantages.
1. From a sales representative perspective, it allows for full transparency of their actual job margins and commission payouts.
2. From a production manager perspective, (this assumes that most production managers do not have access to their companies QB account since that is typically reserved for owners and bookkeepers) it allows for a more complete analysis of the job and ability to more efficiently discover and address inconsistencies.
3. From an economy of motion perspective, it simply reduces the amount of work required to make a meaningful comparison between budget vs. actual because these job costs would no longer have to be manually entered.