Chris McCourt
My feedback
6 results found
-
2 votesChris McCourt
shared this idea
·
-
60 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris McCourt
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
This is interesting idea! I’ll talk to our team and see if we can do this.
Thanks for the feedback.
Chris McCourt
supported this idea
·
-
110 votesChris McCourt
supported this idea
·
-
99 votesChris McCourt
supported this idea
·
-
76 votes
This is an interesting idea. I’ll talk to our team and see if we could do it.
Thanks for your feedback.
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris McCourt
commented
Bump.
New user here. Just signed up for JN. I've looked back at some older posts going back to 2017. It concerns me to see that there is no place to input actual costs and get a true budget vs actuals. It does not need to be a sync to QBs feature and risk potential issues with data. We just need a section where we can add the rolling actuals as they come in. Everything for proper cost accounting is in the software except actuals. Invoices, budgets, estimates. Why not actuals? I created a custom field on the Job info card to capture this, but its a workaround for something that feels like it should exist in the structure provided already.
Concerning that this is still an issue. As a new user to JN but who has worked in various types of software, It feels like an Actuals section for job cost tracking should exist already. It could be a simple section under budgets. Currently I have a custom field to capture this info on the Job info card, but its just a workaround for something that should exist already. Personally, I don't need it to sync to QB. Im quite fine with manually typing in the rolling costs on a weekly basis. Part of the issue why I think QB Sync for actuals could fail is that the devs would have to work on QBs Desktop Sync and then Quickbooks Online. Two different animals because of the way intuit segregates out its software by tiers.